« BLOOMBERG BUSINESS WEEK - Fills gaps in enterprise-type editors, be cost-efficient | Main | Expense of the search - Balloon dad should have to pay »

October 15, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5d2553ef0120a5e9fb78970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Balloon - Was it an attractive nuisance?:

Comments

They should kill this child to prevent further incidents.

The family should immediately sue Disney-Pixar, the producers of the move Up! because it clearly gave the boy the idea that the balloon was a safe means of transporation. This is not the first time that Disney-Pixar has introduced dangerous concepts to small, vulnerable children. The 2007 release Ratatouille was responsible for a threefold increase in domestic juvenille injuries from knife cuts and burns from hot saucepans as children attempted to replicate the "blindfolded chef" character from the movie. I am already in the process of seeking class action certification and will explore the same approach when the inevitable copycat helium balloon excursions have taken the lives of enough small children.

Turns out the boy was hiding upstairs in the attic the whole time.

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/21306839/detail.html

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.